SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


eLuma - Students Need You - September 2025

Working Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review of ASHA's 2007 Position Statement and Technical Report

Working Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review of ASHA's 2007 Position Statement and Technical Report
Sue Caspari, Speech-Language Pathologist, Private Practice
October 8, 2007
Share:

 

Introduction

In March of 2007, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) published its first-ever official policy on childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Increased requests for information about the disorder prompted the development of this policy. The committee charged with this endeavor (Larry Shriberg [chair], Christina Gildersleeve-Neumann, David Hammer, Rebecca McCauley, Shelley Velleman, and Roseanne Clausen) reviewed the "scientific foundations of CAS and trends in professional practice" (ASHA, 2007b, p.1) and published a lengthy (75 pages) technical report (ASHA, 2007b) and a concise 3-page position statement (ASHA, 2007a). Despite the combined length of these documents, the compilation of information into a technical report and a position statement falls short of ASHA's desired outcome of also being able to specify a "knowledge and skills statement" and "practice guidelines" for CAS. This is because there is not enough research evidence to support more specific recommendations and guidelines (ASHA, 2007a, p.1).

However, practically speaking, the committee's position statement and technical report are working documents that clinicians can use to guide assessment and treatment of CAS, and that caregivers can use to help advocate for appropriate speech and language services for their children based on what is currently the best available information. Additionally, the documents present a call for research to researchers and clinicians alike, so the disorder can become better understood and so more definitive practice guidelines can ultimately be established. This paper synthesizes the current position of ASHA on the assessment and remediation of CAS in the form of working guidelines, and makes suggestions for practice based on those guidelines.

Working Guideline #1: CAS Is a Recognized Clinical Disorder

"Apraxia of speech exists as a distinct diagnostic type of childhood (pediatric) speech sound disorder" (ASHA, 2007a, p. 1).

ASHA Position

ASHA (2007a) recognizes childhood apraxia of speech as a unique disorder in which distinct characteristics of speech production and prosody separate it from other speech sound disorders. According to ASHA (2007a), childhood apraxia of speech, with these core features, exists in the following three contexts:

  1. "causally with known neurological etiologies (e.g. intrauterine stroke, infections, trauma);
     
  2. as a primary or secondary sign in children with complex neurobehavioral disorders (e.g., metabolic, genetic); and
     
  3. not associated with any known neurological or complex neurobehavioral disorders...as an idiopathic neurogenic speech sound disorder" (p. 1).

Suggestions for Practice

Ensure that childhood apraxia of speech is on the list of diagnostic categories used by SLPs at your institution. Develop a protocol to differentially diagnose childhood apraxia of speech from other speech sound disorders (e.g., phonological delay, dysarthria), and to determine its relative contribution to a child's communication disorder, especially when it occurs in the context of other neurobehavioral disorders.


Sue Caspari


Speech-Language Pathologist


Private Practice



Related Courses

20Q: Using Speech Science in Clinical Practice
Presented by Amy T. Neel, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10326Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Many speech-language pathology clinicians find speech science daunting and not applicable to their clinical practice. This course discusses why and how speech science is useful in understanding speech disorders and differences. Examples are provided of how to assess and treat speech disorders using speech science-based principles and techniques such as the source-filter theory and acoustic, physiologic and biofeedback measures.

Motor Planning: The Impact on Communication and Beyond
Presented by Joleen R. Fernald, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL, Lyn Bennett, OTR/L
Video
Course: #10222Level: Intermediate4 Hours
Master skills to implement in your practice immediately with continued Master Class. This four-hour course describes the components of motor planning and the areas of impact. Assessment, strategies for supporting clients with motor planning challenges, and tips for discussing praxis with caregivers are also addressed.

20Q: Dynamics of School-Based Speech and Language Therapy Variables
Presented by Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Anne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10002Level: Advanced1 Hour
This course reviews dynamics of speech and language therapy variables such as session frequency, intervention intensity, and dosage, and how these are impacted by different service delivery models. It discusses how therapy outcomes are related to therapy quality, IEP goals, and SLP-level variables such as job satisfaction and caseload size.

Sleuthing for /s/ and /r/: Facilitating Strategies for Residual Sound Errors
Presented by Lynn Berk, MA, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #9237Level: Introductory2 Hours
This course will discuss the rationale and strategies for teaching production of /s/ and /r/ for upper elementary school-age children and older. Errors on these two sounds are considered residual when production continues to be inaccurate beyond the developmental age of acquisition.

20Q: A Continuum Approach for Sorting Out Processing Disorders
Presented by Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10008Level: Intermediate1 Hour
There is a good deal of confusion among audiologists and speech-language pathologists when a diagnosis of “processing disorder” is introduced. This course presents a continuum model to differentiate processing disorders into acoustic, phonemic, or linguistic aspects so that assessment and treatment can become more focused and effective. The roles of audiologists and SLPs in relation to processing disorders are described, and compensatory strategies for differing aspects of processing are presented.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.