SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


EDU Healthcare Opportunities

Basic Principles for Embedding Speech Sound Intervention into Language-Based Activities

Sandra Combs, PhD, CCC-SLP, Shyla Miller, MA, CCC-SLP

February 20, 2017

Share:

Question

What are some basic principles for embedding speech sound intervention into language-based activities?

Answer

North and Hoffman (1990) provide a few noteworthy guidelines for embedding speech sound intervention into language-based activities.  First, systematically set up the environment and stimulus materials.  In other words, alter your language, or make tasks more complex or simple according to the child’s needs. 

Another principle is to select activities that provide frequent communicative opportunities that allow for both modeling and production.  We know that children need many opportunities to produce new sounds and targets. But they also need opportunities to hear the target sounds being used appropriately.  We want to set up activities that allow that to happen.  Some clinicians are apprehensive to do language-based treatment for speech sound goals because they think they can’t get those opportunities in. However, you can work in different prompts, such as providing a tactile cue, asking a clarification question, or restating what the child said in the appropriate way so that their language message is heard, but they also hear a model of the correct production.

The third principle is providing feedback and natural consequences based on the effectiveness of their production. The feedback is directly related to the production, and in a language-based situation there are natural consequences. For example, you are working on velar fronting with a child and you are specifically targeting /k/ and /t/ in ‘key’ and ‘tea’. The child says, “I need the tea.” You hand him the picture of the cup of tea.  The child responds, “No, tea” and he puts his finger on his throat to show the tactile cue for /k/.  You respond with, “Oh, you want the key. What do you want?” And the child tries the sounds production again.  So, the child is given multiple opportunities but the natural consequence of saying ‘tea’ is that the child is given the card with ‘tea’ on it.  He does not get what he asked for. 

That is just one example of a natural consequence and setting up the situation in a way that allows you, as the clinician, to model, give feedback, ask questions and show the child the power of using the sound that is being targeted. 

Please refer to the SpeechPathology.com course, Language-Based Treatment for Children with Speech Sound Disorders, presented in partnership with Cincinnati Children's Hospital for more in-depth information on addressing pediatric speech sound disorders through a language-based approach.


sandra combs

Sandra Combs, PhD, CCC-SLP

Sandra Combs, PhD, CCC-SLP is an assistant professor at the University of Cincinnati, where she has served on the faculty since 2009. She has been a practicing clinician for over 25 years working in in private practice, Head Start, and the schools as well as in research and teaching at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her research and teaching interests include collaboration and coaching teachers and SLPs, early and school-age language development and disorders as well as literacy. Sandra continues to supervise clinically in both Head Start and the University of Cincinnati Clinic. She previously served as the President of OSLHA, the Schools Professional Practice Representative, Scholarship Committee Chair and Honors & Awards Chair. Sandra was the ASHA State Educational Advocacy Leader-Ohio Representative from 2009-2011 and the State Education Advocacy Leader-Ohio Representative from 2009-2011. She has also served on various topic committees for ASHA conventions over the last 5 years. 


shyla miller

Shyla Miller, MA, CCC-SLP

Shyla Miller, MA, CCC-SLP is a speech-language pathologist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Shyla has been with the Division of Speech-Language Pathology since 2009. She earned her Master of Arts from the University of Cincinnati. Shyla’s clinical interests include speech sound disorders, preschool language, resonance disorders, and working with culturally and linguistically diverse families. Shyla is currently serving as Secretary on the Executive Council of the Ohio Speech-Language-Hearing Association. She previously served as the 2016 OSLHA Convention Co-Chair. 


Related Courses

Treatment Approach Considerations for School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorders
Presented by Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9472Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The instructor presented a lot of very good information'   Read Reviews
This course will address the theoretical underpinnings and research base related to differential diagnosis and treatment of articulation and phonological deficits in children with speech sound disorders. Special considerations for how to tailor evaluation and intervention to meet the needs of school-age children will be discussed.

Back to Basics: Down Syndrome
Presented by Theresa Bartolotta, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Theresa Bartolotta, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #8975Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'Great refresher course!'   Read Reviews
This course will serve as a primer on Down syndrome for practicing speech-language pathologists. The basics of the syndrome and common speech, language, voice and fluency issues will be addressed. Effective treatment strategies for improving communication across the lifespan will also be discussed.

20Q: Dynamics of School-Based Speech and Language Therapy Variables
Presented by Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Anne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Text

Presenters

Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLPAnne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Course: #10002Level: Advanced1 Hour
  'Interesting data re: dosage'   Read Reviews
This course reviews dynamics of speech and language therapy variables such as session frequency, intervention intensity, and dosage, and how these are impacted by different service delivery models. It discusses how therapy outcomes are related to therapy quality, IEP goals, and SLP-level variables such as job satisfaction and caseload size.

Sleuthing for /s/ and /r/: Facilitating Strategies for Residual Sound Errors
Presented by Lynn Berk, MA, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Lynn Berk, MA, CCC-SLP
Course: #9237Level: Introductory2 Hours
  'I appreciate the many elicitation techniques this course provided'   Read Reviews
This course will discuss the rationale and strategies for teaching production of /s/ and /r/ for upper elementary school-age children and older. Errors on these two sounds are considered residual when production continues to be inaccurate beyond the developmental age of acquisition.

20Q: A Continuum Approach for Sorting Out Processing Disorders
Presented by Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text

Presenter

Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #10008Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Nice differentiation between disorders'   Read Reviews
There is a good deal of confusion among audiologists and speech-language pathologists when a diagnosis of “processing disorder” is introduced. This course presents a continuum model to differentiate processing disorders into acoustic, phonemic, or linguistic aspects so that assessment and treatment can become more focused and effective. The roles of audiologists and SLPs in relation to processing disorders are described, and compensatory strategies for differing aspects of processing are presented.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.