SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183
Progressus Therapy

Pearson's EBP Briefs: Comparing the Effects of Working Memory-Based Interventions for Children with Language Impairment

Pearson's EBP Briefs: Comparing the Effects of Working Memory-Based Interventions for Children with Language Impairment
Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Chelsea E. Franzluebbers, MA, CCC-SLP
July 26, 2016

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $99/year

Join Now
Share:

Structured Abstract

Clinical Question: Do working memory–based interventions improve language, reading, and/or working memory skills in school-aged children with language impairment?

Method: Literature review of evidence-based practice (EBP) intervention comparisons

Sources: Google Scholar, ASHA journals database, Academic OneFile, Academic Search Complete, and ERIC 

Search Terms: working memory intervention, language impairment

Number of Studies Included: 4

Primary Results: All four studies indicated that children with language impairment made improvements after memory-based interventions, although the improvements may not have been to language skills. Two separate studies reported generalization to untrained areas, namely word reading and expressive language. One study indicated that phonological awareness treatment in addition to language intervention may improve recall-based skills in children with language impairment. One study explored memory-based strategies that may be fruitful for children with language impairment. 

Conclusions: There appear to be direct benefits from targeting working memory skills for children with language impairment. Incorporating phonological awareness and memory strategies into language-based interventions may improve working memory deficits in children with language impairment.

Clinical Scenario

Katie is a school-based speech-language pathologist (SLP) in an elementary school that serves students in kindergarten through grade 6. She has a large and diverse caseload of children with speech and language impairments, although she predominantly works with children who have language impairment (LI) in the absence of other intellectual disabilities. Katie has noticed that many of these children struggle with reading processes, particularly in the area of decoding and comprehension. One child in particular, Marissa, has not been making progress in therapy, despite Katie’s use of various language-based approaches. Marissa is in third grade and has received speech-language services for LI since kindergarten. Marissa’s parents report that homework time is painful for everyone involved. Her teacher reports that Marissa has difficulty answering questions when she is called upon and appears frustrated during independent reading time. Specifically, she has a hard time decoding unknown words and also has difficulty answering comprehension-based questions. The classroom teacher has started to question whether Marissa’s reading comprehension is limited by problems decoding text, understanding the text while reading, or recalling text information after reading. In this way, Marissa is behind many of her peers who are performing well in reading. In therapy sessions, Marissa performs poorly with sequencing, word recall, phonological awareness, following multi-step directions, and sometimes word finding. Although she believes that Marissa’s primary deficit is language-based, Katie wonders if there is a working memory component to Marissa’s LI.

Katie examines the research literature and finds that many children with LI have working memory deficits (Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant, 2004), and, conversely, that many children with working memory impairment have deficits in language (Archibald, Joanisse, & Edmunds, 2011). This discovery leads Katie to explore whether there are effective working memory–based interventions for children with LI and if there are specific techniques that she can incorporate into her therapy sessions with Marissa and other children on her caseload with similar memory concerns. She thus searches for research articles that examine working memory–based interventions for children with LI with potential impacts on language, reading, and/or working memory outcomes. 

Background

In the absence of intellectual disabilities, such as autism and Down syndrome, children with LI characteristically struggle with the processing and production of spoken language. Some of the specific areas in which many of these children have difficulty are word finding, narrative retell and understanding, receptive and expressive vocabulary, grammatical understanding and expression, phonological processing, and working memory. Regarding the latter, working memory is a limited capacity space that is used for the temporary storage of phonological or visual information before it is erased or stored in long-term memory. Cumulative evidence suggests that children with LI have difficulty with working memory tasks (e.g., Boudreau & Constanza-Smith, 2011; Edwards, Beckman, & Munson, 2004; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990). Some specific examples of working memory tasks include following multiple-step directions, repeating nonwords, counting forward or backward by a set incremental amount (e.g., ± 3), transcribing a series of recently heard sentences verbatim, and following the actions of multiple characters over the course of a story (Boudreau & Constanza-Smith, 2011). Working memory has been found to be crucial for vocabulary and reading acquisition (Baddeley, Gathercole, & Papagno, 1998; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990) as well as phonological awareness (Oakhill & Kyle, 2000; Schuele & Boudreau, 2008). Working memory may be involved with reading comprehension tasks such as making inferences, recalling details within a passage, and understanding new vocabulary. Thus, if a child has a working memory deficit (in addition to LI or in isolation), it is likely that the child may exhibit weakness in reading comprehension abilities.

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $99/year

Join Now

Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP

Dr. Kelly Farquharson is a speech language pathologist and assistant professor at Emerson College in Boston, MA.  She is the director of the Children's Literacy and Speech Sound (CLaSS) lab, which is dedicated to improving classroom success for children with speech and language impairments.  Her research interests focus on the cognitive and linguistic underpinnings of speech sound disorders. 


Chelsea E. Franzluebbers, MA, CCC-SLP

Chelsea Franzluebbers is a speech-language pathologist at Columbus Public Schools and Wiggles and Giggles Therapy for Kids in Nebraska.  Her clinical interests include working with the pediatric population, focusing on children with concurrent speech and language disorders, phonological disorders, and complex communication needs. 



Related Courses

Pearson's EBP Briefs: Sleep Disorders as a Risk to Language Learning and Use
Presented by Karla K. McGregor, PhD, CCC-SLP, Rebecca Alper, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #7555 1.5 Hour
Pearson's EBP Briefs are case-based courses designed to assist with everyday decision-making in clinical practice. This case will examine the clinical question, “Are people with sleep disorders at higher risk for language learning deficits than healthy sleepers?” The related literature search and analysis, along with the resultant clinical decision and application to clinical practice, will also be discussed. A good assessment tool for this case is the Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition (PLS-5).

Lesson Planning Essentials: Mapping Evidence-Based Practices to Instructional Design
Presented by Angela Sterling-Orth, MS, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #7465 1.5 Hour
A “quality” lesson plan (whether visualized or in hard copy) is the starting point of a complete and effective treatment session or instructional lesson. This course will walk you through comprehensive lesson planning and offer everything from incidental to powerful suggestions to make a difference in your service delivery. This course is open captioned.

Pearson's EBP Briefs: Telepractice vs. On-Site Treatment: Are Outcomes Equivalent for School-Age Children?
Presented by Stephen Rudolph, MS, ECE, Johanna M. Rudolph, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #7704 1 Hour
Pearson's EBP Briefs are case-based courses designed to assist with everyday decision-making in clinical practice. This case will examine the clinical question, “Do school-age children receiving treatment for speech, language, and/or communication disorders show equivalent benefit from telepractice-based intervention as from on-site intervention as shown by comparable improvement inspeech, language, and communication skills across the two treatment platforms?” The related literature search and analysis, along with the resultant clinical decision and application to clinical practice, will also be discussed. A relevant assessment tool for this case is the PPVT-4 (Dunn & Dunn, 2007)

Pearson's EBP Briefs: The Effectiveness of Academic Accommodations for School-Age Students With Traumatic Brain Injury
Presented by Erin J. Bush, PhD, CCC-SLP, Emily A. Burge, BA
Text
Course: #7703 1 Hour
Pearson's EBP Briefs are case-based courses designed to assist with everyday decision-making in clinical practice. This case will examine the clinical question, “What are the evidence-based classroom accommodations for school-age students with traumatic brain injury who are struggling academically, and do they improve academic performance as compared to no classroom accommodations?” The related literature search and analysis, along with the resultant clinical decision and application to clinical practice, will also be discussed. A relevant assessment tool for this case is the CELF-5 Metalinguistics (Wiig & Secord, 2014).

Pearson's EBP Briefs: Comparison of Parent-Implemented and Clinician-Directed Intervention for Toddlers Identified as Late Talkers: A Literature Review
Presented by Shari DeVeney, PhD, CCC-SLP, Jessica L. Hagaman, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #7938 1 Hour
Pearson's EBP Briefs are case-based courses designed to assist with everyday decision-making in clinical practice. This case will examine the clinical question, “Would a child who is a late talker show greater improvement with parent-implemented intervention models or with clinician-directed intervention models as shown by improvements in expressive language skills?
” The related literature search and analysis, along with the resultant clinical decision and application to clinical practice, will also be discussed. A relevant assessment tool for this case is the Bridge of Vocabulary (Montgomery, 2007).