SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Progressus Therapy

Speech Interventions for Hypokinetic Dysarthria

Antje Mefferd, PhD, CCC-SLP

December 14, 2015

Share:

Question

What speech behavioral interventions are commonly used with speakers with PD and hypokinetic dysarthria?

Answer

The behavioral interventions used for dysarthria are usually global speech intervention.  That means they do not focus on specific speech sounds; they are not articulation therapy like we do with children, where we drill certain sounds.  They are more global and do not focus on specific sounds.  They also do not focus on specific speech components, although it may seem that way when you think about it.  It seems like a “speak louder” approach focuses on the phonatory system, and “maximize articulatory effort” focuses on articulation. There is a great deal of evidence that shows these approaches are not just targeting one subsystem.  The effect actually spreads across all subsystems: respiration, phonation, resonance and articulation.  The global speech interventions include: 

Slow speech. Why use speaking rate reduction?  What is the idea behind implementing slow speech as a treatment for dysarthria?  It is not quite understood how it works, but people are easier to understand when they slow down.  It is thought that people may have more time to reach target positions in the mouth with the tongue, especially when they are constrained in their ability to move fast.  That might help intelligibility, and it may also enhance the coordination between subsystems; for example, the coordination of phonation and articulation, such as voice onset times in stop consonants.  It may give listeners more time to process information that is distorted; they will actually understand better, because they have more time to work on what they are hearing in their head.  It may also help mark word boundaries better, so that the listeners are actually able to tell one word from another word. They are then able to search for what they think the distorted word actually is.  Speech becomes more intelligible that way.  All of these factors possibly contribute to increased intelligibility when using slow speech.

Loud speech. Loud speech is used because it improves vocal quality. It has also been shown to increase the range of fundamental frequencies; those intonation patterns become more pronounced, which seems to help with intelligibility.  Also, articulatory movements change with loud speech.  The jaw usually opens up more and produces larger movements, which may positively impact intelligibility.  And then, the simple fact that audibility is better for the listener may help, especially when you have background noise; better audibility may increase intelligibility as well. 

Clear speech. Last, but not least, the clear speech approach basically uses hyperarticulation.  This is the idea of asking the person to over-enunciate, or to put a lot of effort into enunciating the words, which has been shown to elicit a slower speaking rate and louder speech.  Typically, people start to slow down and to increase their intensity, and that is thought to then have the combined effect of the slow speech approach and loud speech approach, packaged two in one.  Specifically, clear speech focuses on articulation, but it may also improve other aspects of speech.

Antje Mefferd, PhD, CCC-SLP is an Assistant Professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Her research interest is in speech physiology, speech motor control, and the effects of neurological conditions (e.g., neurodegenerative diseases) on speech performance. She is also interested in aging-related changes in speech performance.


antje mefferd

Antje Mefferd, PhD, CCC-SLP

Assistant Professor

Antje Mefferd, PhD, CCC-SLP is an Assistant Professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Her research interest is in speech physiology, speech motor control, and the effects of neurological conditions (e.g., neurodegenerative diseases) on speech performance. She is also interested in aging-related changes in speech performance. Dr. Mefferd has taught undergraduate courses in anatomy and physiology of the speech mechanisms and graduate courses in the area of neurogenic communication disorders (aphasia, dysarthria) and speech science. 


Related Courses

Treatment Approach Considerations for School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorders
Presented by Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9472Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The speaker was very knowledgeable and engaging'   Read Reviews
This course will address the theoretical underpinnings and research base related to differential diagnosis and treatment of articulation and phonological deficits in children with speech sound disorders. Special considerations for how to tailor evaluation and intervention to meet the needs of school-age children will be discussed.

Back to Basics: Down Syndrome
Presented by Theresa Bartolotta, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Theresa Bartolotta, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #8975Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'visuals and overall style of explaining related aspects of down syndrome'   Read Reviews
This course will serve as a primer on Down syndrome for practicing speech-language pathologists. The basics of the syndrome and common speech, language, voice and fluency issues will be addressed. Effective treatment strategies for improving communication across the lifespan will also be discussed.

20Q: Dynamics of School-Based Speech and Language Therapy Variables
Presented by Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Anne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Text

Presenters

Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLPAnne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Course: #10002Level: Advanced1 Hour
  'Easy to follow along/read at my own pace'   Read Reviews
This course reviews dynamics of speech and language therapy variables such as session frequency, intervention intensity, and dosage, and how these are impacted by different service delivery models. It discusses how therapy outcomes are related to therapy quality, IEP goals, and SLP-level variables such as job satisfaction and caseload size.

Sleuthing for /s/ and /r/: Facilitating Strategies for Residual Sound Errors
Presented by Lynn Berk, MA, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Lynn Berk, MA, CCC-SLP
Course: #9237Level: Introductory2 Hours
  'Great techniques to use in therapy'   Read Reviews
This course will discuss the rationale and strategies for teaching production of /s/ and /r/ for upper elementary school-age children and older. Errors on these two sounds are considered residual when production continues to be inaccurate beyond the developmental age of acquisition.

20Q: A Continuum Approach for Sorting Out Processing Disorders
Presented by Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text

Presenter

Gail J. Richard, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #10008Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'It was very informative regarding the areas of APD, and the responsibilities of the SLP and Aud was also helpful'   Read Reviews
There is a good deal of confusion among audiologists and speech-language pathologists when a diagnosis of “processing disorder” is introduced. This course presents a continuum model to differentiate processing disorders into acoustic, phonemic, or linguistic aspects so that assessment and treatment can become more focused and effective. The roles of audiologists and SLPs in relation to processing disorders are described, and compensatory strategies for differing aspects of processing are presented.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.