SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


CaptionCall Mobile App - January 2020

Word Retrieval Treatments with Aphasia

Word Retrieval Treatments with Aphasia
Holley Freyaldenhoven, Kim McCullough, Nancye C. Roussel, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, Kim McCullough, Holley Freyaldenhoven
June 5, 2006
Share:

Abstract:

This single-subject study examined the effects of semantic and phonological cueing treatments on the word finding abilities of a sixty-four-year-old male with anomic aphasia, targeting the participant's specific level of lexical processing impairment (i.e. predominantly lexical-semantic, predominantly lexical-phonological, or mixed semantic-phonological). This investigation was a modified replication of a study by Wambaugh and colleagues (2001) which compared the effects of semantic and phonological cueing treatments on individuals with aphasia with differing levels of deficit. The participant received both treatments at single-word and conversational levels. Each treatment consisted of a pre-stimulation phase and a treatment phase in which response-contingent hierarchical steps were applied. Results indicated that although the participant clinically appeared to benefit from both types of treatments, there was a more positive response to the phonological cueing treatment.

Introduction:

Aphasia is known to be a highly variable, heterogeneous disorder. Few patients with aphasia follow a specific spontaneous recovery pattern, and few receive the same specific treatment for their impairment. One common form of language impairment exhibited by patients with aphasia is naming deficits. Some naming deficits in individuals with aphasia respond better to phonological cueing treatments that utilize first sound, syllable or rhyming cues to facilitate naming of target words. However, some types of naming deficits respond better to semantic cueing treatments that utilize cues such as sentence completion, the function of the target word, the location of the target word, or a superordinate of the word. Based on these different types of naming deficits, two types of treatments are typically used to address these deficits; those that target lexical-semantic levels of processing (Drew & Thompson, 1999; Kiran & Thompson 2003) and those that target lexical-phonological levels of processing (Raymer, Thompson, Jacobs, & LeGrand, 1993; Miceli, Amitrano, Capasso, Caramazza, 1996).

Treatments based on lexical processing models have been successful at facilitating generalization for patients with aphasia. If the clinician can identify the lexical level at which the breakdown occurs, specific treatment can be used to target that particular level of processing. For example, if an individual with aphasia-induced word retrieval deficits has a deficit at the lexical-semantic level of processing, semantic cueing treatments would best facilitate naming and generalization for the individual.

Tasks used to target lexical-semantic levels of processing typically involve judging semantic relatedness of items, categorizing objects or pictures, matching words to pictures, describing semantic features and providing synonyms and antonyms (Wambaugh, Linebaugh, Doyle, Martinez, Kalinyak-Fliszar, & Spencer, 2001). Drew and Thompson (1999) examined the effects of a semantic treatment on the acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of picture naming tasks to improve discrimination of perceptual, functional, and associative attributes of the pictures. The effectiveness of excluding a target word to facilitate the naming of pictures in two semantic categories, the promotion of generalization within and across semantic categories, and maintenance of trained words were targeted to measure treatment effects. Also, the addition of a phonological component to improve naming abilities was targeted to measure the effects of the treatment. Drew and Thompson (1999) concluded that treatment plans should be specifically based on the impaired level of processing in the individual and demonstrate the rationale for specifically based treatment for impaired levels of processing.

This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.
This page The rest of this article is not available, because you are not logged in to your SpeechPathology.com account.

Join Now to get the whole article and handouts.

Holley Freyaldenhoven


kim mccullough

Kim McCullough


nancye c roussel

Nancye C. Roussel, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

Dr. Nancye Roussel is an associate professor and Head of the Department of Communicative Disorders.  She has over twenty years of experience teaching in the areas of voice, swallowing and motor speech disorders as well as the neurophysiology of the speech mechanism.  Her research interests include the use of instrumental analysis in the description of voice and speech disorders. 


Kim McCullough


holley freyaldenhoven

Holley Freyaldenhoven



Related Courses

Vanderbilt SLP Journal Club: Prognosis for Aphasia Across the Continuum of Care
Presented by Michael de Riesthal, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #8209Level: Advanced1 Hour
Providing a prognosis for recovery for individuals with aphasia is an important part of clinical care, but accurate prediction is often limited. This course will discuss factors that influence recovery of language function following onset of aphasia, and biographical, behavioral, and medical variables that may aid provision of a prognosis.

Best Practice for Assessment and Treatment of Bilingual Aphasia
Presented by Maria Muñoz, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #9759Level: Intermediate1.5 Hour
This course focuses on best practice in the assessment and treatment of bilingual aphasia by speech-language pathologists. Recommended practices are contrasted against common mistakes made by clinicians working with bilingual patients with aphasia. Implementation of best practices are modeled through case studies.

20Q: Goal and Treatment Selection in Aphasia in 20 Sessions or Less
Presented by Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #9281Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Have you ever wondered how to focus aphasia therapy and set reasonable goals when treatment time is limited? This course will provide evidence-based guidance on goal-setting and treatment selection for aphasia with examples from time-limited situations.

Evidence-Based Practice: Leading to Evolution of New Treatment Approaches for Aphasia
Presented by Emily Boss, MS, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #8293Level: Intermediate1.5 Hour
This is Part 1 of a two-part series. This course reviews evidence-based practice and provides an overview of relevant theory for the development of a new semantically-based sentence-level treatment approach for persons with aphasia: Semantic Priming to Improve Comprehension and Expression of Sentences (SPICES). (Part 2: Course 8296)

Interpreting Test Scores & Key Concepts with Standardized Tests
Presented by Carolyn (Carney) Sotto, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #8295Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Many of the assessment instruments we use are norm-referenced tests that are standardized. There are certain statistical properties needed to understand the psychometric criteria of the tests, which is part of being an informed consumer. This course will help SLPs understand fundamental concepts of descriptive statistics so they can interpret test scores correctly and summarize quantitative data about their clients or patients.