SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183

Woven Care - Better together.

Effective Teambuilding for Professionals

Effective Teambuilding for Professionals
Vicki Larson, ASHA Fellow
June 4, 2007


Teamwork and being a team player are critical to personal and professional success. Regardless of our professional role or job setting, we often are asked to participate on teams and to engage in collaborative consultation. To do collaborative consultation skillfully and run productive IEP meetings, one must be a team player. Teamwork is learned behavior and yet, often, it is assumed that it is an innate skill. Since teamwork is learned behavior, it is a skill set we should strive to learn and perfect. Teamwork allows us to learn from each other and to improve our own critical thinking processes. Productive teams create a synergy that often produces outcomes far greater than one person can produce. Synergy happens when the voices of different people with different perspectives harmonize together. The purpose of this article is to discuss and answer the following questions: What is a team? What general characteristics should a team strive to cultivate? What factors need to be considered in team building? What characteristics should a team leader have? How should one select team members? What qualities do effective team members possess? And why do teams fail or struggle to succeed?


A review of the literature (Blanchard, 2001; Brounstein, 2002; Katzenback & Smith, 1993; Robbins and Finley, 1995) reveals a working definition of a team as a group of individuals who are being organized so they will work together to achieve common goals for which they will collectively share responsibility. Easily said but difficult to accomplish. There are three critical aspects that should be noted in this definition:

  1. putting people together to do work;
  2. having an overall common purpose (i.e., the same outcome or result is needed); and
  3. being mutually accountable (i.e., every team member is equally responsible for getting the job done).

The bottom line is that everyone must work together to achieve a common outcome or to accomplish a common purpose (Robbins & Finley, 1995). The key words are together, common purpose, and accountable. A true team is a living, constantly changing, dynamic force in which a number of people come together to work (Heller, 1998b). A team is different from a work group or committee. A team must take collective responsibility (not just have individual accountability); make decisions and solve problems (not just share information); focus on team goals or outcomes (not on individual outcomes or personal goals). It is that collectivity and collaboration that makes a team a team.

Shared Characteristics of Productive Teams

Teams are productive for a number of reasons regardless of the goals or outcomes to be accomplished by the team. Robbins and Finley (1995) have observed these characteristics of productive teams. Productive teams:

  • Work to improve communication among people
  • Take on work willingly that ordinary groups cannot do
  • Make better use of resources and thus are more cost-effective
  • Are more efficient at solving problems
  • Make higher quality decisions
  • Improve processes and don't blame others for undesirable outcomes
  • Put diverse ideas and people together
  • Collaborate with each other to bring about a synergy

These characteristics, when combined, produce educational and business outcomes that financially and personally create win-win situations. The desired outcomes are realized not only for the members of the team but more importantly for those who (our students and clients) benefit from the team's deliberations and work.


vicki larson

Vicki Larson

ASHA Fellow

Related Courses

Treatment Approach Considerations for School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorders
Presented by Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9472Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course will address the theoretical underpinnings and research base related to differential diagnosis and treatment of articulation and phonological deficits in children with speech sound disorders. Special considerations for how to tailor evaluation and intervention to meet the needs of school-age children will be discussed.

Reading Comprehension and the SLP: Foundational Understanding
Presented by Angie Neal, MS, CCC-SLP
Course: #10763Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This is Part 1 of a two-part series. This course provides SLPs with foundational knowledge needed to directly address and collaboratively support reading comprehension across all grade levels. Models of language and reading comprehension, comprehension processes vs. products, instruction in comprehension skills vs. strategies, factors in reading comprehension difficulties, and connections to general education are discussed.

Assessment of School-Age Clients through Telepractice
Presented by William Bolden, MA III, CCC-SLP
Course: #9740Level: Introductory1.5 Hours
This is Part 1 of a two-part series. Many SLPs may feel uneasy when beginning to assess clients remotely. This course provides practical information on how to ethically and reliably assess school-age clients via telepractice, accommodate/modify assessments as needed, and report assessment results.

Reading Comprehension and the SLP: Contributions of Language
Presented by Angie Neal, MS, CCC-SLP
Course: #10764Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This is Part 2 of a two-part series. The connections between reading comprehension and areas of language such as vocabulary, morphosyntax and social communication are described in this course. Implications for intervention/instruction and collaboration with educators are also discussed.

Executive Functioning: Beyond the Basics for School-based SLPs
Presented by Victoria Bondurant, MS, CCC-SLP, Joseph Walsh, MS, MEd, CCC-SLP
Course: #10765Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course builds on course 10193, “Executive Functioning: Intervention Principles and Strategies for School-Based SLPs,” and extends participants' knowledge base to encompass more advanced concepts and approaches for scaffolding executive function (EF). Specifically, behaviors that signal a need for intervention and strategies that target social and academic impacts of EF difficulties are described.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.