SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Signature Healthcare

A Comparison of Nasality Measures between Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech, Children with Repaired Cleft Palate, and Typically Developing Children

A Comparison of Nasality Measures between Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech, Children with Repaired Cleft Palate, and Typically Developing Children
Amy Skinder-Meredith, PhD, CCC-SLP, Susan Carkoski, MA, Natalie Graf, MA
December 13, 2004
Share:

Abstract:

Nasalance is the ratio of acoustic energy output from the oral and nasal cavities of a speaker. Previous research noted abnormal resonance in children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Although this characteristic has often been observed, little research has focused specifically on resonance.

The purpose of this study was to examine the velar function of children with CAS, compared to children with repaired cleft palate (RCP) and typically developing children (TD). Children with RCP are at higher risk for hypernasal resonance due to structural differences. Acoustic nasalance measures and perceptual measures were made.

Results indicated children with CAS spoke with slightly more nasality than typically developing peers, and with less nasality than children with RCP. In addition, children in the CAS and RCP groups had much greater ranges in nasalance scores and perceptual scores of nasality than their TD peers.

Rationale/Background:

Previous research noted abnormal resonance in some children with CAS (Ball, Beukelman, & Bernthal, 1999; Hall, Hardy, and La Velle, 1990; Skinder, 2000; Weiss, Gordon, & Lillywhite, 1987). Given that CAS is a disorder where the child has difficulty planning the sequence of movements required for speech (Rosenbek & Wetz, 1972) and difficulty with spatio-temporal coordination (Velleman, 2003), researchers speculated that some children with CAS may have difficulty planning movements of the velum, just as they do with other articulators (Hall, Hardy, and La Velle, 1990; Weiss, Gordon, & Lillywhite, 1987).

In a previous study, Skinder-Meredith found eight of 10 children with CAS were judged to have hypernasal resonance (Skinder, 2000). More specifically, given a rating from one to five, where one represented "hypernasality is never present" and five represented "hypernasality is always present," the eight children judged as hypernasal had an average rating of 3.27 with a standard deviation of 1.1, indicating that hypernasality was sometimes present. In addition, listeners rated how often they heard hyponasality. Two of the three listeners judged only one child as having some hyponasality present. Difficulty in timing and or sequencing the velar movement correctly could result in inconsistent resonance errors and account for the most noted perception of "sometimes hypernasal". Hall and colleagues (1990) stated some children with CAS continue to be perceived as hypernasal, even as their speech skills improve.

On occasion, a child with CAS may have such severe velopharyngeal insufficiency that prosthetic intervention may be warranted. For example, Hall and colleagues (1990) treated one girl with a palatal lift after finding that behavioral therapy alone was not enough to improve intelligibility. Although the girl was able to raise her palate in some situations she was not able to do so in a timely and consistent manner for functional speech. The palatal lift allowed increased success with intelligibility. Weiss and colleagues (1987) noted a child with CAS that had severe intermittent velopharyngeal closure. They gave her the diagnosis of "velar dyspraxia".

To further investigate nasality in children with CAS, this study compared nasalance measures and perceptual measurements of nasality of children with CAS to children with repaired cleft palate (RCP) and typically developing children (TD). Nasalance is the ratio of acoustic energy output from the oral and nasal cavities of a speaker. Instrumental measures of nasality can be helpful because listeners often have difficulty discerning between hyponasality and hypernasality (Boone & McFarlane, 2000).

The Kay Elemetrics' Nasometer II Model 6400 can be used to acoustically and numerically measure nasalance. The Nasometer II is a computer based device that "provides objective measures of nasality by deriving a ratio of acoustic energy output from the oral and nasal cavities of a speaker." (Anderson, 1996, p.333). The Nasometer II includes headgear with a horizontal divider between the nose and mouth, which is attached to a computer.

When comparing perceptual and acoustic nasalance measures between the three populations (CAS, TD and RCP) it was predicted that children with CAS would have greater disordered nasal resonance than TD children, but less disordered nasal resonance than children with repaired cleft palate.

 

amy skinder meredith

Amy Skinder-Meredith, PhD, CCC-SLP

Dr. Skinder-Meredith received her doctorate from the University of Washington in 2000. She is currently an Associate Clinical Professor at Washington State University in Spokane, WA. She is an experienced clinician who has worked in the public schools, hospitals, and private practice settings for 20 years.  Her primary clinical and research interest is in children with motor speech disorders, and she has published and presented her research on childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) at national conferences. She has also been active in international outreach in China and Guatemala, working with children with motor speech disorders, cleft lip and palate, and intellectual disabilities. Dr. Skinder-Meredith has given numerous workshops for practicing speech-language pathologists across the country on assessment and treatment of CAS. She also has great interest in craniofacial anomalies and counseling skills in the field of communication disorders. She has two adopted children with cleft lip and palate, which has allowed her to experience the roles of parent and professional in regards to children with communication impairments.


Susan Carkoski, MA


Natalie Graf, MA



Related Courses

Textbook: Here’s How to Treat Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 3rd Edition
Presented by Margaret Fish, MS, CCC-SLP, Amy Skinder-Meredith, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10674Level: Advanced24.5 Hours
Based on the textbook Here’s How to Treat Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS): Third Edition, this course discusses the most current research regarding the nature of CAS, best practices in evaluation, and effective treatment approaches, along with considerations related to motor learning and co-occurring challenges. It provides a holistic overview of the complex needs of children with CAS at various stages of development.

20Q: Induced Laryngeal Obstruction - An Overview for Speech-Language Pathologists
Presented by Robert Brinton Fujiki, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #10761Level: Intermediate1 Hour
The nature of induced laryngeal obstruction, including comorbidities and causes, and the speech-language pathologist’s role in evaluation and treatment of this disorder are described in this course. Current diagnostic and treatment practices and research updates pertaining to the condition are discussed.

20Q: Pediatric Voice Disorders: Diagnostic and Treatment Approaches
Presented by Susan Baker Brehm, PhD, CCC-SLP, Barbara (Derickson) Weinrich, PhD, CCC-SLP, Lisa Nelson Kelchner, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Text
Course: #8972Level: Introductory1 Hour
This course provides the practicing speech-language pathologist with information on special considerations in the treatment of children with voice disorders. The various causes of voice disorders are discussed as well as the treatment of specific types of disorders.

20Q: Evaluation and Treatment of Speech/Resonance Disorders and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction
Presented by Ann W. Kummer, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #8729Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Children with speech and resonance disorders (hypernasality, hyponasality, and cul-de-sac resonance) and/or nasal emission present challenges for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in all settings. This article will help participants to recognize resonance disorders and the characteristics of velopharyngeal dysfunction, and provide appropriate management.

20Q: Criteria for Diagnosing Apraxia of Speech (AoS) in Adults
Presented by Katarina Haley, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #9498Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course reviews the criteria currently used to diagnose AoS after stroke and other adult-onset neurologic conditions. A distinction is made between features that are part of the presentation profile, and features that are useful for differentiating AoS from aphasia with phonemic paraphasia and dysarthria. In addition, challenges of diagnosing AoS and useful assessment tools are discussed.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.