SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


SP - Adriana Lavi Sponsored Course 2020

Advances in Neurolinguistics: Semantics of Word Production in Aphasia

Advances in Neurolinguistics: Semantics of Word Production in Aphasia
Arpita Bose, PhD, Lori Buchanan, PhD, Gary Libben, PhD
March 28, 2005
Share:

Arpita Bose, Ph.D., & Lori Buchanan, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
University of Windsor, Canada

Gary Libben, Ph.D.
Department of Linguistics
University of Alberta, Canada


Introduction:

Neurolinguistics is focused on understanding neural mechanisms underlying comprehension, production and abstract knowledge of language, be it spoken, signed or written. Historically, neurolinguistics has been most closely associated with aphasiology, the study of linguistic deficits resulting from brain damage. However, in recent years, the field of neurolinguistics has broadened. Researchers are investigating various types of speech-language disorders (e.g., stuttering, dyslexia) as well as normal language processing to better understand the neurological and cognitive bases of language processing.

Neurolinguistics is an interdisciplinary endeavor involving linguistics, psychology, neurobiology, speech-language pathology and computer science, to name a few. Researchers are drawn from a variety of backgrounds and bring a wide range of experimental techniques and differing theoretical perspectives. Researchers in neurolinguistics employ traditional and advanced neurophysiological and brain imaging techniques. Traditional methodologies may include; behavioral data, reaction time and error rate measures to tasks such as picture naming or word comprehension. Advanced technologies may include brain imaging techniques (e.g., Positron Emission Tomography [PET], functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging [fMRI]) and gross electrophysiological techniques (e.g., Electroencephalography [EEG], Event Related Potentials [ERP]).

This article will focus on word processing and lexical access with respect to aphasia, with an emphasis on semantics of word processing. We chose to focus on word processing and/or lexical access because difficulty in naming (e.g., anomia) is virtually universal in aphasia. Errors in naming are generically referred to as paraphasia. Collectively, this term is applied to any unintended error of word or sound choice. Paraphasias include phonemic paraphasia (production of unintended sounds or syllables in the utterance of partially recognizable word, e.g., 'paker' for 'paper'), semantic paraphasia (production of word similar in concept or meaning to the correct production, e.g., 'butter' for 'bread') and neologism (the production of nonsense word or words, usually without recognition of errors, e.g., 'table' becomes 'tilto').

The most studied paraphasia is the semantic error. Semantic errors have long been of interest to aphasiologists for what they reveal about the organization of semantic knowledge and how this explains speech planning (Dell, Schwartz, Martin, Saffran, & Gagnon, 1997). The origin and locus of semantic errors in aphasia have been explained from different perspectives depending on the theoretical background of the researcher (Dell et al., 1997; Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).


arpita bose

Arpita Bose, PhD


Lori Buchanan, PhD


Gary Libben, PhD



Related Courses

Best Practice for Assessment and Treatment of Bilingual Aphasia
Presented by Maria Muñoz, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #9759Level: Intermediate1.5 Hour
This course focuses on best practice in the assessment and treatment of bilingual aphasia by speech-language pathologists. Recommended practices are contrasted against common mistakes made by clinicians working with bilingual patients with aphasia. Implementation of best practices are modeled through case studies.

20Q: Goal and Treatment Selection in Aphasia in 20 Sessions or Less
Presented by Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #9281Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Have you ever wondered how to focus aphasia therapy and set reasonable goals when treatment time is limited? This course will provide evidence-based guidance on goal-setting and treatment selection for aphasia with examples from time-limited situations.

Where Do I Start with My Client with Aphasia?
Presented by Jacqueline Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video
Course: #9320Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course is for clinicians who don’t often see people with aphasia in their settings, but need a quick update on best practices. Evidence-based guidelines and resources will be provided to enable SLPs to provide high quality services to someone with aphasia, even with limited materials.

Research Watch Report: "Intensive" Evidence-Based Aphasia Interventions
Presented by April Garrity, PhD, CCC-SLP
Text
Course: #8811Level: Advanced1 Hour
This Research Watch Report focuses on some of the most current research in the area of intervention for aphasia; specifically, a modified version of constraint-induced language therapy, and usability and effectiveness of telepractice applications. Three articles are summarized and potential clinical applications of the evidence are discussed.

C.A.P.E: 4 Essential, Evidence-Based Categories for Aphasia Assessment and Treatment
Presented by Roberta Elman, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS, ASHA Fellow
Video
Course: #8825Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This is Part 1 of the five-part series, Five Fresh Perspectives on Applying LPAA Principles to Treatment for Neurogenic Communication Disorders. This course will discuss the rationale that supports the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA), and application of LPAA across a variety of clinical settings utilizing the C.A.P.E. categories (Connecting people; Augmentative/Alternative communication (AAC); Partner training; Education and resources). Examples will be chosen to reflect real-world situations that clinicians can apply to their own clinical practice. (Part 2: Course 8887, Part 3: Course 8891, Part 4: Course 8894, Part 5: Course 8895)