SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183

The Stepping Stones Group - Now Hiring - February 2021

How to Conduct an Assessment that is Focused on the Client’s Preferred Activity

Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP

November 30, 2020



How do I conduct an assessment that is focused on the client’s preferred activity?


To ensure the client’s preferred activity is the focus of your goals, start your evaluation by determining client priorities. After that, you can select some assessments – formal or informal, as needed – that specifically inform the activity that is important to the client. This is a patient-centered approach to goal-setting (Leach, Cornwell, Fleming & Haines, 2010).

For example, a young adult with aphasia is the parent of young children who comes to you for intervention. Let’s imagine that, for this person, being able to say important things to the children (like, “Stop that!” Get down from there!”, or “I love you”) is critical, along with being able to read a bedtime story. If we know this first, before we even give any standardized assessment, we can tailor our tests to those that will very specifically relate to those personal priorities. Can the person express imperatives in any form such as gesture, intonation, some words? Can the person read single words or short phrases aloud – specifically, those with children’s level vocabulary? Or, can the person repeat single words of that same type from children’s stories? These are the skills that we need to know. The oral reading score on a standardized aphasia battery provides some information about this but doesn’t really give you everything you need to move quickly into personally relevant goals and therapy planning.

Our goal is to make every minute of contact time contribute to the achievement of one or more personally relevant priority goals. Using the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), an evidence-based approach, can help ensure that a client is fully engaged in setting their rehabilitation goals. It is a collaborative approach in which the client and clinician agree to a goal – such as being able to read a simple Dr. Seuss book to their child. Then, together, the client and clinician establish criteria levels for what the outcome of working on this goal might look like, and both client and clinician select a pre-treatment rating level. After a pre-determined amount of treatment time, both client and clinician assess the outcome level, using the same criterion scale.  This approach is a great way to incorporate person-centered care with pre/post-treatment measures and would be easy to include in many documentation requirements.

Refer to the SpeechPathology.com course, 20Q: Goal and Treatment Selection in Aphasia in 20 Sessions or Less, for more information on goal-setting and treatment selection for aphasia during time-limited situations.

jackie hinckley

Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP

Dr. Jackie Hinckley is currently Associate Professor at Nova Southeastern University and serves as Executive Director Emeritus of Voices of Hope for Aphasia. She is the Project Lead on the PCORI-funded project, ‘A National Research Incubator for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Communication Disabilities”. Her research focuses on treatment effects and the nature of treatment research, including replication and implementation science. Dr. Hinckley is the author of two books, Narrative-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, and What Is It Like to Have a Communication Impairment?  Simulations for Family, Friends, and Caregivers. She is Board Certified in Neurogenic Communication Disorders (Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders & Sciences) and serves on the Advisory Board of the National Aphasia Association.

Related Courses

20Q: Goal and Treatment Selection in Aphasia in 20 Sessions or Less
Presented by Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP


Jackie Hinckley, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9281Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The content and examples'   Read Reviews
Have you ever wondered how to focus aphasia therapy and set reasonable goals when treatment time is limited? This course will provide evidence-based guidance on goal-setting and treatment selection for aphasia with examples from time-limited situations.

20Q: Infection Control Strategies for SLPs
Presented by A.U. Bankaitis Smith, PhD


A.U. Bankaitis Smith, PhD
Course: #9729Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Very good info'   Read Reviews
Speech-language pathologists are expected by policy authorities to apply appropriate measures to protect patients, co-workers and themselves in clinical situations that may expose individuals to infectious microbes. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing infection control principles within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including discussion of personal protective equipment (PPE) and disinfecting and cleaning products.

20Q: Pediatric Voice Disorders: Diagnostic and Treatment Approaches
Presented by Susan Baker Brehm, PhD, CCC-SLP, Barbara (Derickson) Weinrich, PhD, CCC-SLP, Lisa Nelson Kelchner, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S


Susan Baker Brehm, PhD, CCC-SLPBarbara (Derickson) Weinrich, PhD, CCC-SLPLisa Nelson Kelchner, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Course: #8972Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'good information for lower incidence population in settings, good refresher for pediatric voice concerns'   Read Reviews
This course provides the practicing speech-language pathologist with information on special considerations in the treatment of children with voice disorders. The various causes of voice disorders are discussed as well as the treatment of specific types of disorders.

Vanderbilt SLP Journal Club: Prognosis for Aphasia Across the Continuum of Care
Presented by Michael de Riesthal, PhD, CCC-SLP


Michael de Riesthal, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #8209Level: Advanced1 Hour
  'Interesting topics covered'   Read Reviews
Providing a prognosis for recovery for individuals with aphasia is an important part of clinical care, but accurate prediction is often limited. This course will discuss factors that influence recovery of language function following onset of aphasia, and biographical, behavioral, and medical variables that may aid provision of a prognosis.

20Q: Early Childhood Stuttering: Less-Direct and More-Direct Treatment
Presented by J. Scott Yaruss, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-F, Nina Reardon-Reeves, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-F


J. Scott Yaruss, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-FNina Reardon-Reeves, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-F
Course: #8978Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The instructor provided practical examples that can be used in therapy, for example, practice tightening large and small muscles'   Read Reviews
This course addresses key issues in the treatment of early childhood stuttering, with a focus on less-direct and more-direct treatment approaches. The course will discuss ways that clinicians can draw upon various approaches to develop individualized treatment so that each child’s and family’s individual needs are addressed.