SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Progressus Therapy

Predictors of Aspiration

Debra Suiter, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S

August 29, 2016

Share:

Question

What are some predictors of aspiration? 

Answer

There are certain behaviors to look for at bedside that may be predictors of aspiration.  Some of the behaviors typically include: cough, dysphonia, dysarthria, watering eyes/runny nose/sneezing, and absent gag response.

Cough

Cough is the main behavior that is thought to be a reliable predictor of aspiration. There is plenty of evidence in the literature saying that is true. For example, Smith-Hammond compared subjective clinical assessments of signs of aspiration (Smith-Hammond et al., 2009). In addition to cough, she looked at absent swallow response and difficulty handling secretions. She then compared those subjective assessments to objective measures of cough, and found that clinical signs were about 74% accurate for detecting aspiration. There was fairly low sensitivity, and higher specificity, which means there is a pretty high rate of false negative responses relying on those clinical signs. The objective measures of voluntary cough were more accurate, as might be expected. In reality, in clinical practice, many SLPs do not have access to those objective measures. There is some information saying those clinical signs are pretty good.  But, if you have access to more objective measures, that is even better.

Dysphonia

Some studies have indicated that the presence of dysphonia (breathiness, hoarseness or harshness) is predictive of aspiration. If someone has a breathy vocal quality, perhaps they're not fully adducting their vocal folds; therefore, they have decreased airway protection at the level of the vocal folds, perhaps placing them at increased risk of aspiration.

Wet vocal quality has traditionally been thought of as a predictor of aspiration. If it can be heard after someone has swallowed, that is considered to be a pretty good predictor of, at least penetration or perhaps aspiration.  However, clinicians don't always hear wet vocal quality when there is material sitting in the larynx during phonation. Just because we don't hear it, does not necessarily mean that the person didn't aspirate or penetrate.  

Additionally, a separate study by Georgia Malandraki in 2011 found that reduced pitch elevation was predictive of poorer scores on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (an eight-point scale developed by J. Rosenbeck and colleagues).

Dysarthria

Dysarthria has also been looked at as a predictor of aspiration. Researchers, Daniels et al. and McCullough et al. (2005) found that the presence of dysarthria is significantly associated with increased aspiration risk in individuals with stroke.

Watering Eyes/Runny Nose/Sneezing

The presence of watering eyes, runny nose and sneezing is frequently discussed when determining predictors of aspiration.  In fact, they are autonomic reflexive responsive to irritants to the eyes or nose and should NOT be considered reliable predictors of aspiration. Watering eyes and a runny nose occur due to trigeminal field irritation (irritants to cornea, nasal mucosa, etc.). I suppose if nasal regurgitation occurs, that would qualify as an irritant and cause rhinorrhea. However, I am completely unaware of any evidence that these symptoms (or sneezing) are indications of aspiration.

Absent Gag Response

I have received referrals from physicians simply based on the fact that a patient does not have a gag response. Steve Leder conducted a study in 1996 looking at individuals with an absent gag response and found the vast majority of them were able to eat a normal diet safely. The gag response was absent in 13% of individuals who did not have dysphagia.  He concluded that the absence of gag response does not appear to be a predictor of dysphagia.

Debra Suiter is Director of the University of Kentucky Voice and Swallow Clinic in Lexington, Kentucky. Together with Dr. Steven Leder, Dr. Suiter developed the Yale Swallow Protocol, a tool for determining aspiration risk. Dr. Suiter’s research and clinical interests focus on assessment and treatment of adults with swallowing disorders.


debra suiter

Debra Suiter, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-S

Debra Suiter is Director of the University of Kentucky Voice and Swallow Clinic in Lexington, Kentucky. Together with Dr. Steven Leder, Dr. Suiter developed the Yale Swallow Protocol, a tool for determining aspiration risk. Dr. Suiter’s research and clinical interests focus on assessment and treatment of adults with swallowing disorders. She is the current Chair of ASHA’s Board of Special Interest Coordinators, a member of the American Board of Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders, and a member of the Dysphagia Research Society. 


Related Courses

Pharmacology and Swallowing
Presented by Angela Mansolillo, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Video

Presenter

Angela Mansolillo, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Course: #8464Level: Intermediate1.5 Hour
  'Wonderful and knowledgeable presenter!'   Read Reviews
Speech Language Pathologists are often asked to make recommendations for safe swallowing of medications for patients with dysphagia, but have limited information about pharmacodynamics. This course will provide clinicians with the information they need to understand and manage swallowing-related medication effects, identify potential impacts of food and thickener on medication effectiveness, and prevent medication errors in their clients with dysphagia.

Abnormal Findings During Endoscopy: When to Refer
Presented by Joy Hesse, MA, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Joy Hesse, MA, CCC-SLP
Course: #8538Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The videos in this course were absolutely stellar'   Read Reviews
This course will discuss case examples of abnormal anatomy of the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, hypopharynx and larynx in adults, compiled over 20 years of evaluating and treating voice and swallowing disorders in an Otolaryngology practice.

Back-To-Basics on Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study: Safety & Efficiency and the Underlying Structure & Physiology
Presented by Karen Sheffler, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Video

Presenter

Karen Sheffler, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Course: #8044Level: Intermediate2 Hours
  'Diagrams and videos'   Read Reviews
Explore the latest evidence and expert advice about the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (aka, Modified Barium Swallow Study). This course will discuss the reason for referral, the exam and analysis, and recommendations. Rather than just following the bolus and reporting on aspiration, it is important to determine the pathophysiology behind the aspiration and residue. This course will cover what can be done to improve the swallow and make appropriate referrals and recommendations to guide treatment. Learn what can be offered (e.g., pulmonary clearance techniques, oral hygiene) and what options are available based on the patient's goals, when aspiration cannot be prevented.

What Do I See? Analyzing Interesting Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies
Presented by Karen Sheffler, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Video

Presenter

Karen Sheffler, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Course: #8301Level: Advanced1.5 Hour
  'It was helpful to think through these challenging case studies with then expert eyes of our presenter'   Read Reviews
Interpreting what you hear from your patient in addition to what you see on a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) will help guide your impressions, recommendations, referrals and treatment options. This course will show how to perform online analysis that leads to a more productive VFSS and assists in revealing WHY the patient is having difficulty with the safety and efficiency of the swallow, and what can we do about it.

Decision Making for Alternate Nutrition and Hydration - Part 1
Presented by Denise Dougherty, MA, SLP
Video

Presenter

Denise Dougherty, MA, SLP
Course: #9581Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'instructor giving examples of things that have happened to her in relation to this course'   Read Reviews
This is Part 1 of a two-part series about alternate nutrition and hydration (ANH). This course reviews patient and family concerns that impact the ANH decision-making process, including religious beliefs and culture. Advance directives are discussed and resources for patients/families are provided.