SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183

Med Travelers - December 2019

Pediatric TBI: Current Statistics

Jennifer Lundine, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS

August 5, 2020



What are the current incidence and prevalence rates for pediatric brain injury in the United States?


According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), if we look at traumatic brain injury for people who are presenting at least to an emergency department we see that the three groups most at risk for TBI involve the pediatric population. There are about 700,000 children ages 0-14 who are sustaining traumatic brain injuries every year.  That is likely a low estimate of the number of actual injuries because again, we are only including children that report to an emergency department.

What happens to these children? We know that less than four percent of these children are actually admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. There are some estimates that say about two and a half million students in our country’s educational system every year have sustained a traumatic brain injury at some point. Again, this particular statistic excludes all of those other types of brain injuries that have non-traumatic mechanisms.

These statistics are important because research shows that children who are not admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit are less likely than those who do go to inpatient rehab to receive ancillary services such as speech therapy after they leave the hospital. This may be because children who are admitted to an inpatient rehab unit have more severe injuries, or perhaps because inpatient rehab allows more time to educate families about the importance of follow-up. Service providers need to realize there is a huge majority of children who do not get admitted to an inpatient rehab unit and thus are at risk for cognitive-communication challenges and are also less likely to receive services in the schools or in outpatient clinics. If there are two and a half million students every year in our schools that have sustained a traumatic brain injury, we are likely under-serving or under-identifying them 98-99% of the time. Very few of them are showing up as having a traumatic brain injury in our special education counts. By no means am I saying that every student who sustains a traumatic brain injury will require services, but certainly, it is likely more than one to two percent.

Why is there such a huge discrepancy? It is in part related to the fact that standardized testing often does not identify deficits in these children. Another part of the reason is that these children go back to school and they look okay; they are walking and they are talking and these later deficits become “invisible,” in a sense. Additionally, there is the challenge that deficits grow in later years in children who sustain a brain injury. Sandra Chapman (2006) coined the term “neurocognitive stall” to help describe this phenomenon. It refers to the fact that children who sustain a brain injury often regain the skills that they had prior to their injury, but later on, they have trouble keeping up with developmental milestones due to the injuries to the brain that impacted their memory centers and later-emerging cognitive skills, such as attention, memory, self-awareness, organization, and problem-solving.

Please refer to the SpeechPathology.com course, Using Nonstandardized Assessment to Evaluate Cognitive-Communication Abilities in Students with Traumatic Brain Injury, for more information on the challenges and opportunities to evaluating cognitive-communication disorders in children and adolescents with TBI.


jennifer lundine

Jennifer Lundine, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS

Jennifer Lundine, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences at the Ohio State University and a researcher at Nationwide Children's Hospital, where she formerly worked as an SLP on the pediatric rehabilitation unit. Her research focuses on improving gaps in access to and utilization of services to support children with acquired brain injury (ABI) and identifying specific approaches to improve assessment and treatment practices for these children.

Related Courses

Using Nonstandardized Assessment to Evaluate Cognitive-Communication Abilities in Students with Traumatic Brain Injury
Presented by Jennifer Lundine, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS


Jennifer Lundine, PhD, CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS
Course: #9035Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'the presenter offered some practical examples of how to complete nonstandard assessments and how they can benefit the students with TBI'   Read Reviews
This course will address the challenges and opportunities for speech-language pathologists who evaluate cognitive-communication disorders in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Specific, evidence-based strategies for nonstandard assessment will be discussed.

Relationships between Language and Executive Functions: Planning and Regulating
Presented by Jill K. Fahy, MA, CCC-SLP


Jill K. Fahy, MA, CCC-SLP
Course: #8998Level: Intermediate1.5 Hour
  'I appreciated the hands on problem solving activity ideas to incorporate language therapy with EF therapy, as well as the goal/objective bank'   Read Reviews
This is Part 2 of a two-part series. This course will detail the relationship between language and executive functions (EFs), and the nature of EF deficits in children with language disorders. The use of inner speech and self-talk to regulate behaviors and efforts, and the use of complex syntax as a tool to reason, plan, predict, and solve will be discussed. Additionally, the course will describe the use of hands-on problem solving, Socratic questions, and discovery learning to elicit language-based EFs. (Part 1: Course 8993)

Neurodiversity: How to Support Agency and Self-determination
Presented by Joleen R. Fernald, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL


Joleen R. Fernald, PhD, CCC-SLP, BCS-CL
Course: #9590Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'This course provided the background knowledge needed for special services to work with autistic clients'   Read Reviews
It is imperative for clinicians and educators to be aware of the neurodiversity movement in order to better support all human rights. This course discusses what neurodiversity is and the history of the movement, as well as the potential for trauma related to behavioral interventions. Case examples demonstrate how to apply a paradigm shift to clinical practice that seeks to accept and celebrate differences rather than mask them.

20Q: Dynamics of School-Based Speech and Language Therapy Variables
Presented by Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLP, Anne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP


Kelly Farquharson, PhD, CCC-SLPAnne Reed, MS, CCC-SLP
Course: #10002Level: Advanced1 Hour
  'This course provided information in a variety of areas that therapists have to consider everyday'   Read Reviews
This course reviews dynamics of speech and language therapy variables such as session frequency, intervention intensity, and dosage, and how these are impacted by different service delivery models. It discusses how therapy outcomes are related to therapy quality, IEP goals, and SLP-level variables such as job satisfaction and caseload size.

How to Write SMARTER IEP Goals: Strategies for SLPs
Presented by Kelly Ott, M.Ed, MHS, CCC-SLP, Lara L. Wakefield, PhD, CCC-SLP


Kelly Ott, M.Ed, MHS, CCC-SLPLara L. Wakefield, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #6683Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Good information about making our goals smarter; good information around the law; liked the ideas shared about teachers collecting data'   Read Reviews
The acronym S.M.A.R.T.E.R. can be used as a mnemonic to assist SLPs with writing Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals that align with federal and state mandates. This course explores the following concepts of the mnemonic: Specific, Measurable, Attainable within a year, Research-based, Teachable with cues and strategies, Evaluated and communicated to parents, and Relevant to common core or state standards. Examples of SMARTER IEP goals will be provided in the course to demonstrate how to use the mnemonic for best practices.

SpeechPathology.com is committed to safeguarding the privacy of everyone who uses our services. In addition to our Privacy Policy, we have a Privacy Notice that further outlines protections of the rights of California residents in accordance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).