SpeechPathology.com Phone: 800-242-5183


Progressus Therapy

Guidelines for School Report Writing

Barb Miller, M.S.,CCC-SLP

May 21, 2007

Share:

Question

Could you offer a good form for school report writing and some guidelines to follow?

Answer

For report writing in the schools as a follow-up to IAT (Intervention Assistance Team) and MFE (Multifactored Evaluation), I do not use a particular form, but I do follow specific guidelines. The guidelines I follow came about following a special education staff meeting and the suggestions given are followed throughout our district.

There are four main sections of the report format: identifying information (name, address, DOB, grade level, and teacher); background information; assessments; and interpretations/summary. In background information, I relay dates and interventions implemented during the student's IAT. Intervention plans and progress from those interventions are noted in this section, followed by the specific reasons for the referral to the MFE. This paragraph typically concludes with the decision to initiate an evaluation and identifies a suspected area of disability.

The assessment section follows. I begin by describing the student's entry into the testing situation and report his/her social pragmatic skills of engaging, maintaining, and initiating conversation. I note how comfortable the student is with the testing situation as well and if this changes by the end of the assessments. Each assessment is described and if a formal tool is used, I list the name of the test, the standard score, and standard deviation used to analyze student performance. (ie., The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III, based on a standard score =100 with a standard deviation =15, was utilized to measure receptive vocabulary knowledge. I then describe what the student is doing during the test (ie., "The student is presented with four black-line drawings and asked to point to the picture which matches what the examiner names.") The score obtained by the student is reported in this section for each formal test used. If informal assessments are used (informal writing sample or oral language sample), I report the percentages the child demonstrated per target. This type of description is particularly helpful to a parent so that they can better understand what skills their child is doing during the various assessments.

Before I leave the assessment section, I do comment on test-taking behavior and strategies I observed during the various tests. Student strengths as well as areas of concern are noted in this section. It is important to report observed behaviors and avoid interpreting them at this point.

During the interpretation and summary section, I report if the student's skills in the various areas assessed (social pragmatics, articulation, oral fluency, receptive and expressive language, written language) fall within the average, above average, or below average ranges. Using formal test guidelines, it is possible to make finer interpretations by adding modifiers such as moderately or severely below the average range when comparing student performance to their same age peers. I follow up with suggestions of strategies that may help the student in his/her classroom (ie., visual models, multistep problems or directions presented in simpler steps). I am careful to not make any statement as to whether or not a student qualifies for the disability which is suspected; this determination is a team decision which is made by all members at the MFE meeting and documented on the final pages of the MFE paperwork following the discussion of all team members' findings.

I have found these guidelines helpful in my report writing in my district. I believe the language used in these reports is both professional and parent-friendly when presently critical information about a student, highlighting both strengths and areas of need. More importantly, these components lend themselves to the next possible step, planning for a more in-depth interventions or an IEP.

Barb Miller, speech/language pathologist, obtained her training from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. She has been employed by Hamilton County Educational Service Center (HCESC) for 26 years and assigned to Norwood City Schools since 1980. She particularly enjoys helping students rehearse and master their communication skills within their classroom environments and had been a part of a three year training grant to provided classroom intervention with Norwood regular education teachers, the University of Cincinnati, and HCESC. Barb currently works at Norwood View, Norwood Middle, and Norwood High School. She resides in Anderson Township with her husband, her three daughters, and her large dog and tailless cat. Barb's hobbies include reading and teaching swimming lessons to students with special needs.


barb miller

Barb Miller, M.S.,CCC-SLP


Related Courses

Treatment Approach Considerations for School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorders
Presented by Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenter

Kathryn Cabbage, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9472Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The speaker was very knowledgeable and engaging'   Read Reviews
This course will address the theoretical underpinnings and research base related to differential diagnosis and treatment of articulation and phonological deficits in children with speech sound disorders. Special considerations for how to tailor evaluation and intervention to meet the needs of school-age children will be discussed.

The Ripple Effect of Stuttering: A Community-Based Approach
Presented by Craig Coleman, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-F, ASHA Fellow, Mary Weidner, PhD, CCC-SLP
Video

Presenters

Craig Coleman, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-F, ASHA FellowMary Weidner, PhD, CCC-SLP
Course: #9217Level: Intermediate2 Hours
  'Great examples of treatment'   Read Reviews
This is Part 2 of a four-part series. The stuttering experience has a ripple effect that extends far beyond the child who stutters. Parents, teachers, peers, and others must possess both knowledge and skills to best support children who stutter. This course will highlight new clinical tools and resources to provide a community-based treatment approach for stuttering. (Part 1 - Course 9278, Part 3 - Course 9301, Part 4 - Course 9304)

Behavioral Frameworks for Dementia Management
Presented by Mary Beth Mason, PhD, CCC-SLP, Robert W. Serianni, MS, CCC-SLP, FNAP
Video

Presenters

Mary Beth Mason, PhD, CCC-SLPRobert W. Serianni, MS, CCC-SLP, FNAP
Course: #9473Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Instructors provided detailed examples and researched information'   Read Reviews
This course will focus on cognitive-communication intervention strategies for various dementia presentations and will provide a review of evidence-based treatment. Behavioral frameworks along with their rationales will be introduced and applied across several dementia types and mild, moderate and severe levels of impairment.

20Q: Infection Control Strategies for SLPs
Presented by A.U. Bankaitis Smith, PhD
Text

Presenter

A.U. Bankaitis Smith, PhD
Course: #9729Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Clarification of COVID precautionary information'   Read Reviews
Speech-language pathologists are expected by policy authorities to apply appropriate measures to protect patients, co-workers and themselves in clinical situations that may expose individuals to infectious microbes. This article provides practical guidelines for implementing infection control principles within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including discussion of personal protective equipment (PPE) and disinfecting and cleaning products.

Thickened Liquids in Clinical Practice: The Plot “Thickens”
Presented by Angela Mansolillo, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Video

Presenter

Angela Mansolillo, MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-S
Course: #10497Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Information is useful and gives "food for thought" with my residents/patients in my facility on thickened liquids'   Read Reviews
Clinicians who utilize thickened liquids in their clinical practice are aware of their benefits, but what about the risks and contraindications? Advantages and disadvantages of thickened liquids are reviewed in this course with a focus on clinical outcomes, including impacts on medication administration, lung health, and hydration. Product types are evaluated to facilitate appropriate choices for individual clients.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.